Miller refused to name her sources in the Plamegate affair.

Well, rejoins the Senator, reporters refuse to name their sources, so why can't he?

Though the newspaper didn't name its sources, it's clear from the group's goals that the founders essentially want to be the anti-WikiLeaks.

Besides he did not name his other sources.

In many cases he fails to name his Arabic sources.

The reporters also claimed that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and press protected them from having to name their sources.

He was ordered to name his sources.

Yes, it is in the public interest to protect journalists from being required to name their sources in the courtroom.

But when reporters were subpoenaed and asked to name their sources, they understandably resisted.

I was also under the impression that Newspapers had a collective standing policy of not naming their anonymous sources?