So this is about cutting public expenditure then, isn't it?

The plan could easily cost $100 billion-150 billion a year, a massive increase in public expenditure.

The record shows that during the 1980s we were able both to increase public expenditure in real terms by about 20 percent.

The public expenditure on education as a percentage of total government spending that year was 14.09%.

In terms of both coverage and public expenditure, it is considered to be the most important food security network.

Because public expenditure was involved, the judges did not always get all the changes they wanted.

What, then, is the truth about the size of public expenditure?

The 1979 government was returned with a mandate to cut public expenditure.

And where will that come from if there is no significant public expenditure?

When you think about it, the Union spends only 3 % of public expenditure.