The poor law, on the other hand, had been changed but little.

Most significant were those around the operation of the poor law.

The first changes concerned the administration of the poor law, which was carried at parish level.

It is evidence of a move away from the Poor Law system.

The divorce law and the poor law come in for little of his attention.

A number of similar cases concerned with the Poor Laws followed.

For example, parishes carried out the duties required by the poor law.

It's definition came about as a result of the Poor Law.

The most significant of these were concerned with education and Poor Law relief.

Opposition to the Poor Law grew at the beginning of the 19th century.

During this period the cost of the Poor Law system decreased.

After 1870, for the first time he directly discussed practical questions, writing on poor laws and economics.

Further American criticism is based on the idea that it is poor law.

Anyone unemployed for longer than that had to rely on poor law relief paid by their local authority.

This was a continuation of the role local government had held under the Poor Law.

The Poor Law had been altered in 1834 because of increasing costs.

The Poor Law was facing criticism from a range of sources.

Three points remain to be touched on in connexion with the Elizabethan poor law.

In that sense, the poor Law was a mechanism whereby one class imposed a particular view of family responsibility upon another.

The second part of the bill dealt with poor law guardians and district councils.

Scotland (another topical reference) did not reform its poor law until 1845.

It contributed more to the economy than the state paid in Poor Law contributions.

It is part of the Thurles poor law union.

Returning soldiers further added to pressures on the Poor Law system.

The board of health was also part of Stockport poor law union.