Brothers, let me extend my hand to you in our mutual exclusion.

But in some cases, their mutual exclusion is not fully sustained.

In other words we need a way to execute a critical section with mutual exclusion.

One of the main alternatives is mutual exclusion or locking.

Originally, this problem was conceived as being one of mutual exclusion on a single computer.

The programmer must use a lock to provide mutual exclusion.

The three criteria are mutual exclusion, progress, and bounded waiting.

The techniques of mutual exclusion are used to prevent this concurrent use.

Note that without this mutual exclusion, in the present example, two threads could cause money to be lost or gained for no reason.

They did not then proceed to resolve their current No. 1 friction, the mutual exclusion of each other's construction companies.

Removing the mutual exclusion condition means that no process will have exclusive access to a resource.

There are both software and hardware solutions for enforcing mutual exclusion.

Instead of that, there are mutual exclusions that cannot live in the same world with each other.

A lock is designed to enforce a mutual exclusion concurrency control policy.

A more elegant method for achieving mutual exclusion is the busy-wait.

The defining characteristic of a monitor is that its methods are executed with mutual exclusion.

For many applications, mutual exclusion is not enough.

Examples of such problems include the dining philosophers problem and other similar mutual exclusion problems.

The use of shared memory and an atomic test-and-set instruction provides the mutual exclusion.

Threads had access to a single kind of mutual exclusion primitive, and one of seven priorities.

The mutual exclusion primitive could be ported to any architecture with an atomic test and set instruction.

The readers-writers problem is a generalization of the mutual exclusion problem.

Thus mutual exclusion is poorly suited to asynchronous fault tolerant systems.

Since mutual exclusion is implicit with monitors, no extra effort is necessary to protect the critical section.

This problem can be avoided using mutual exclusion to ensure that simultaneous updates to the same part of the list cannot occur.