In this case, the court outlined the basic standards for determining competency.

However, the court outlined specific criteria which must be satisfied to justify involuntary medication.

The court also has original jurisdiction in a few other circumstances as outlined in the Arizona Constitution.

In the case the court outlined a test, sometimes called the Andrews test to determine if there has been a prima facie violation of equality rights.

The high court also confronted the issue of remedy in Machinists v. Street, and outlined several options which unions and employers might adopt as well as rejecting remedies which the district court in the case had chosen.

The court outlined its duties in imposing a sentence of its own.

We believe the program will fall within the parameters the court outlined.

The court outlined the following factors in determining whether there is an infringement:

The court outlined five ideas that it identified as basic to a GUI desktop: windows, icon images of office items, manipulations of icons, menus, and the opening and closing of objects.

In addition, the court outlined examples of factors that show "objective evidence of nonobviousness".