Imputed bias arises when a decision-maker has a pecuniary (monetary) or proprietary (property related) interest in the decision he or she is charged to adjudicate.

Again, the true bias arises from the race of the victim, regardless of the killer's race.

Although negative affect and biases arise, the overall benefit is positive for human behavior.

In addition, biases can also arise because they are closely related to the high level cognitive operations and complex social interactions.

Therefore choice-supportive bias would arise because their focus was on how they felt about the choice rather than on the factual details of the options.

This reveals that choice-supportive biases arise in large part when remembering past choices, rather than being the result of biased processing at the time of the choice.

In addition, bias may arise due to differentials in the amount of protein-coding sequence on each strand, as codons do not all occur with equal frequency.

The bias arises daily in many ways and places.

Others argue that inherent biases (willful or not) arise in the presentation of facts, especially controversial topics and public or historical figures.

However, a bias also arises because of the labeling of this event and what some consider genocide, as realism.