I cannot agree with you because once again your article hasn't actually said anything.

As the article says, a rich country with poor people.

The first article said so, and this one does too.

Not sure what this article is saying if anything at all.

Great article, I agree with pretty much everything you've said.

But six years later, the article said, the man came back.

This is 100% not true, and the article even says why.

To be fair, I think the article says as much.

But your article says that it almost certainly did not.