Davis' argument has also been criticized by Andy Lamey for being based on only two studies that may not represent commercial agricultural practices.

This argument has been criticized as fallacious from a number of different angles.

Additionally, the argument that great variability automatically meant greater range was criticized by Hollingworth.

De Sitter's argument was criticized because of possible extinction effects.

This argument can be criticized on the grounds that a state bureaucracy cannot be called a class.

This novel epistemological argument has been criticized similarly to other probabilistic design arguments.

However, Good's argument is criticized for being expressed in terms of absolute potentials.

The argument was criticized on the basis of lack of evidence and White retracted his claim.

Spencer's argument has been criticized by complementarian authors and at least one egalitarian writer.

Lewis's Christian apologetics, and this argument in particular, have been criticized.