We're going to continue to reduce welfare in New York City more than anyplace else.
It would appear that the coalition government have achieved their aim of reducing welfare by 2015!
Politically, it is very popular to talk about reducing welfare.
In a law that has reduced welfare by more than 50 percent, this is one of the provisions that went too far.
A voluntary exchange may reduce societal welfare if external costs exist.
In such a dynamic industry, "patent protection may reduce overall innovation and social welfare".
Who would have thought a killing trap might, temporarily, reduce welfare to a very low level!
The scale on which we've reduced welfare is greater than any place else in America.
If this system reduced corporate welfare by only 10 percent, it would more than cover the cost.
This causes fewer transactions to occur, which reduces economic welfare; the individuals or businesses involved are less well off than before the tax.
