Sometimes you can't tell the magic realism from the corn.

His films are known for their use of magic realism.

All this adds up to a kind of magic realism.

In this movie, so are the magic realism and the corn.

Is such a process an example of what the academics call "magic realism"?

In a way, Williams anticipated a kind of magic realism for the stage.

This, after all, is the privilege of magic realism: it never has to lead, much less add up, to anything.

He is known for his unique style, influenced by magic realism.

It should not be confused with a separate movement known as Magic realism.

This is truly magic realism: the kind you can't see, that has to be explained.

The house does have an air of magical realism, as if anything could happen.

But in terms of magical realism, theater always does it better.

I'm going to guess that you're a big fan of magical realism.

What for lack of another name could be called a magical realism.

There are strong elements of magical realism in the novel.

Well, magical realism, but also just very upsetting, dark things that people don't want to look at.

And that - thanks to more than a dash of magical realism - is half the fun.

At other times, however, his reliance on the techniques of magical realism seems forced.

He was among the first to use magical realism.

It has an atmosphere of what you might call magical realism.