It was the first time that a Soviet leader had given full weight to this country's policy of neutrality in world politics.
His father had initiated a relatively successful policy of neutrality.
America's early presidents had tried very hard to maintain a policy of neutrality where other countries were concerned.
Vatican City maintained an official policy of neutrality during the war.
The Afghan king's policy of neutrality was not universally popular within the country, however.
In the west, Sweden followed a policy of neutrality, but during the 1920s it took a more active regional role.
In the 18th century, it just tried to maintain its independence and stuck to a policy of neutrality.
The Swedish neutrality policy meant that the government could not interfere with the trade.
In the 1930s, the Dutch government pursued a policy of strict neutrality.
How is it possible for a country wishing to maintain a credible policy of neutrality to go along with this?
