Which, it could be argued, is actually a good thing, given how mass parties tend to behave.

Political parties, however, tended to reflect the make up of the three main ethnic groups.

In the twentieth century, liberal parties tended to name themselves radical, democratic or republican.

One party tends to want something from the government, and an official wants something in return.

The court found in most marriages one party tends to suffer economic disadvantage from the marriage.

The second was that crowded parties tended to be uncomfortable affairs for her.

Plus, the parties tend to take themselves very seriously.

Rather I think that parties often tend to take themselves particularly seriously.

Political parties also tend to be deeply rooted in the history and culture of a particular country.

Some other parties claim to be universal in nature, but tend to draw support from particular sections of the population.