Essentially, they are the cutoff values for taxable income - income past a certain point will be taxed at a higher rate.
This has led some researchers to adopt published cutoff values without empirical determination.
Another possibility relates to the negative/positive cutoff value used.
A cutoff value has been suggested to be 0.73, with a higher value indicating presence of multiple sclerosis.
In real populations, the cutoff value of s may depend instead on local recombination rates.
The fifth percentile for gestational age is sometimes used as a cutoff value.
The cutoff value of 350 makes the limits of these "We" values, 15/16 and 1/16 respectively.
In practice, we have found 60 and 120 as useful cutoff values for significance of correlation or anticorrelation, respectively.
The option is extended to jurisdictions for grades in which the expected sample size exceeds the designated cutoff value.
The largest among the "significant" probe set was defined as the cutoff value.
