Yet in the end, the argument does not really show causation.

The continued argument about transport development shows how important a part it still plays in the economy of the US.

A similar argument shows that the lower left branch of the curve also has the same two lines as asymptotes.

After doing research, lawyers make arguments to show that the people they work for should win in court.

According to Salmon's critique, the ontological argument thus shows nothing.

An inductive argument shows how the m can be constructed.

A second argument, however, shows that the jar is empty.

Similarly, this same argument shows that when is even, will be even.

Yesterday, the lawyers' final arguments on both sides showed how ambiguous those tapes could be.

In this context, one uses such arguments to show the following: