A similar argument applies to the fact that they didn't study Jews who lived in the city.

The same argument - and numbers - apply to the defense.

Those arguments applied only so long as they had no hard evidence.

"And I said the same argument would apply just as well to a murderer."

Being dead, however, these arguments did not apply to eating him, as we were sure he would himself acknowledge.

These arguments apply with particular force to the study of state enterprises.

That argument should surely still apply, can you not see it?

The same argument applies to your college subjects, and to a more important degree.

So the same argument applies now to the nomination of the Commission.

And how does your argument apply when the animal is doing the "giving"?