Well, except for all the other countries that already have net neutrality.

And how many people know exactly what net neutrality is anyway?

Net Neutrality laws are the wrong approach for this problem.

The current form of net neutrality is not good for consumers.

This has been a new issue in the recent debate over net neutrality.

Questions of net neutrality aside, we'll be watching this model with interest.

The problem is we have the wrong organization trying to push net neutrality.

I don't think line sharing is a good example of how net neutrality isn't needed.

For us, a simple declaration on net neutrality is not enough.

In practice, net neutrality is also influenced by state level politics.

In short, this Act is trying to promote net neutrality.

Of course, the other place that net neutrality supporters can go is Congress.

Most of the key online players came out for net neutrality on Monday.

That would be because most folks have no idea what "net neutrality" actually means.

You make it sound as if he knows and/or cares what net neutrality is.

In the last week, there was a limited but important victory for net neutrality.

She is known as a champion of net neutrality, and has written on many other current policy issues.

The chairman can therefore take net neutrality "off his plate."

I had one telling me that this report is a danger to net neutrality.

Net neutrality is an issue where the public interest can and should trump the special interests.

Without net neutrality this will be an experiment in fail.

Whatever happens in Congress, the net neutrality rules are also the subject of lawsuits.

I think the rules put in place the two biggest foundations of net neutrality.

Earlier this year, he began speaking out in favor of "Net neutrality."

There has been extensive debate about whether net neutrality should be required by law.