In many cases, the commission chose instead to let industry set the standards itself.

But the commission chose to make a different set of recommendations on this subject.

I get the impression, though, that this is where the Commission has chosen the wrong track.

Alternatively, the Commission can also choose to monitor the situation.

The Commission, however, because it cares about bodies involved in youth, education and culture, did not choose the easy way out.

The Commission cannot pick and choose the hierarchy of articles in this respect.

It seems to me that the Commission has chosen the right priorities for the short and medium term.

Just why the commission chose to resurrect the case is another mystery.

Instead, the Commission chose to embark on a huge public relations exercise.

The commission voted 4 to 2 not to appeal the judge's ruling, and chose the second option.