The joint resolution would be read in the chamber for the third and last time.

Generally, there is no legal difference between a joint resolution and a bill.

That is something else on which we agree, and this joint resolution says so.

We do not support the joint resolution, and let me explain why.

The standards that we want have been set out clearly in the joint resolution.

I wish to state once again the main points of our joint resolution.

In this specific case, I feel, however, that the joint resolution goes beyond what is necessary.

Since the joint resolution does not take that line we cannot support it.

Just look at all the questions we ask in the present joint resolution.

I have to say to them: if you believe that, why is it not in your joint resolution?