Again, the wave function of the system itself does not change.

But is the wave function itself "real" in any traditional sense?

It is in this way related to the wave function.

The wave function of this situation is going to collapse quite soon.

This I believe is common with each of these wave function described processes.

What collapses the Wave function into some particular physical state?

It is important to emphasize that the wave function of the system has not changed itself.

This is called the solution space of the universal wave function.

The likelihood of each outcome is given by the wave function.

Do this a thousand times and you will begin to see the overall shape of the wave function.

At the center of quantum physics is a wave function.

How, then, do we see a particle in a specific position when its wave function is spread across all space?

These linked quantities are the means to working each other out of the wave function.

The amplitude is the value of the wave function at a certain position and time.

"But what alternative is there to collapsing the wave function?"

We use items known as wave functions to describe particles.

How can Wigner and his friend see different wave functions?

"There are two ways in which the wave function of an object can change.

The positions of the particles do not affect the wave function.

A qualitative plot of the wave function is shown in figure 2.

He also described how measurement could cause a collapse of the wave function.

What does the term "an instantaneous change to the wave function" mean?

In fact, if there is any wave function renormalization, it most certainly will.

Therefore, problems in quantum mechanics center around the analysis of the wave function for a system.

Interference is nothing more than the addition, in the mathematical sense, of wave functions.