The suits, which began in 1978, argued that the purchases were invalid because states could not buy the land without the central government's permission.

The suit argued that state school spending still discriminated against students in poor districts.

Under that proposal, the homes would have been more affordable to minority applicants, the suit argues.

The suit argues, however, that the housing authority discouraged the tenants from exercising free choice.

The suit argues that the court should force the group to sell its holding in the fund.

Her suit argued that she was being denied her right to equal protection under the law.

They are, the suit argues, part of the King estate and belong to his heirs.

The suit argues that the city knew, or certainly should have known, that the children were in danger.

The suit also argues that the reactor is already in violation of state and Federal water pollution laws.

The suit argued that this presented a breach of the consignment agreement.