Response bias is present when a question contains a leading opinion.

However, the possibility of response bias should be taken into consideration with these figures.

Three major studies have been published examining abortion response bias.

First, self-reported data are subject to social desirability and response bias.

This in turn would reduce response bias from subjects.

They stated that some answers may have been due to a response bias meaning people who could not remember simply devised a made up answer.

The sampling must be done carefully or there could be a response bias.

It concluded that if studies least susceptible to response bias are considered, they suggest there is no association between abortion and breast cancer.

The results argued against significant response bias.

Response bias results from the F scale being uniformly worded in a confirming direction.

Survey results may be affected by response bias, where the answers given by respondents do not reflect their true beliefs.

While researchers have suggested that a response bias exists toward particular stimuli, such as contamination, the underlying cause is still unclear.

This version of the model has a series of additional assumptions that must be met, i.e., no response bias.

Response bias in assessing sexual behaviors relevant to HIV transmission.

Kirscht and Dillehay (1967) outlined several problems with the Berkeley studies, including response bias.

If the latter is the case, then this would skew the survey results; this is a kind of response bias.

If neither verbatim nor gist traces are retrieved, then one might accept any test probe on the basis of response bias.

Since viewers are aware of being part of the Nielsen sample, it can lead to response bias in recording and viewing habits.

A formal model is based on the decision-making process model of how questions are answered (with parameters for competence, response bias and guessing).

The high proportion of adults with cystic fibrosis in non-manual occupations may reflect selection or response bias.

The figures obtained have been criticised as inflated by cognitive biases, such as response bias or wishful thinking.

Such surveys potentially suffer from a number of shortcomings; strategic behaviour, protest answers, response bias and respondents ignoring income constraints.

This increased taste response is not the result of response bias or a scaling artifact, but appears to have an anatomical/biological basis.

Moreover, response bias may occur and CTS does not factor in the cases of nonrespondents.

Perception of contingency in conditioning: Scalar timing, response bias, and the erasure of memory by reinforcement.