putting-out system

The putting-out system had been replaced by a factory system.

The putting-out system is a means of subcontracting work.

However, bar some technological advancements, the putting-out system has not changed in essential practice.

He typifies a rhetoric of conflict inherent in the putting-out system.

Entrepreneurs organized a number of manufacturing households into a single enterprise through the putting-out system.

Nevertheless, the capitalist relations of the putting-out system provided a wide arena for disputes.

But relations between masters and men could be friendly and mutually regarding even under the putting-out system.

The contrast with another poem, this time describing relations in the putting-out system of the West Country, is striking.

The raw materials were often provided by the merchant, who received the finished product, hence the synonymous term putting-out system.

Prior to the Industrial Revolution, a seamstress did handsewing, especially under the putting-out system.

Of course, the acquisition of profit largely depended on which part of the putting-out system one was associated with.

This system replaced the putting-out system.

In the great wool districts a form of factory system had been introduced but in the uplands weavers worked from home on a putting-out system.

The ie operated on a system very similar to what economists today call the "Putting-Out system" or "workshop system."

This proved more efficient for the administration and distribution of materials to individual workers than earlier methods of manufacturing, such as cottage industries or the putting-out system.

Proto-industrialization was marked by the increasing involvement of agrarian families in market-oriented craft production, mainly through the putting-out system organized by merchant capitalists.

A weavers' cottage was (and to an extent is) a type of house used by weavers for cloth production in the putting-out system sometimes known as the domestic system.

The rationale of the putting-out system was that it enabled the merchant capitalist to draw on only as much labour as he needed at any given condition of the market.

Oldknow used Putting-out system of production in Anderton, whereby raw cotton was distributed to spinners and yarn to weavers who worked in their homes and workshops.

In economics a workshop may refer to small scale craft operations, such as blacksmiths and wagon makers, or to the workshop system (domestic or putting-out system), a means of subcontracting piecework.

His Quaker father started out as an illiterate nailer at Stourbridge, but, through thrift and considerable business acumen, became a manufacturer of nails on the putting-out system, an ironmonger, and an owner of iron-refining works.

As the demand for cotton goods rose (partly owing to economic growth caused by advances in agricultural techniques and extended foreign trade) cotton production shifted from the putting-out system to mills being set up in the rapidly urbanising towns.

Much manufacturing in the 18th century was carried out in homes under the domestic or putting-out system, especially the weaving of cloth and spinning of thread and yarn, often with just a single loom or spinning wheel.

The reason for this shift, according to Marglin, was not the higher efficiency of factory production compared to home-working under the putting-out system, but because the merchants could not force the home-workers to work hard enough to meet the increased demand for cotton.

With this in mind, the new findings of scholars working in the Marxist tradition to show the importance of putting-out systems of production such as the Verlag in proto-industrialization, take on a new significance (e.g. Kriedte et al.