So far, leaders of Local 6 have chosen to stall rather than negotiate.

If the leader of the Jewish fighting forces chose to ignore him, what could he do about it?

However, we certainly should assure they have legitimate, honest leaders to choose from.

Given those options, no American leader could have chosen differently.

If the factions shift, their leaders meeting together may at any time choose for themselves a different chief.

"But in order to preserve the character of the town, the leaders have chosen not to do that."

The question is how the leaders in both houses choose to reconcile the two approaches.

The leaders of the assemblies chosen however they see fit.

Don't you think they would then have more invested in the cause than if their leaders choose for them?

Why can only the leader choose for all his people?