Full explanations of each individual discrepancy appear in the notes to this article.
The overall explanation, it said, appears to lie in many factors, none of which by itself can be viewed as key.
A more likely explanation appeared to lie in the seemingly closed system of reasoning voters brought to the process.
The explanation appeared to satisfy for it went on, "The youngest sample will witness first."
Moreover, this explanation does not appear in print until 40 years after the war.
The plague explanation did not appear until the mid-twentieth century.
The explanation appears to be certain factors in the labor market.
Unlikely as this explanation appeared, nothing more plausible occurred to me.
But they said that explanation did not appear to be supported by their findings.
Does not explanation appear to be of this nature?
