The 3n excitation function was completed with a maximum at 8 pb.

The 180° excitation function has also been computed.

ET excitation functions are generated by using numerical optimization methods.

ET excitation functions are publicly available through internet websites.

Data in bold represents maxima derived from excitation function measurements.

A third method utilizing transfer excitation functions is introduced using qualitative arguments.

ET excitation functions are categorized into four generations as follows:

A double peaked structure is demonstrated to be a common feature of the excitation functions and reasons for this are discussed.

All previous concepts and models of such nuclear interactions predict structureless excitation functions.

Nuclear excitation function and particle emission from complex nuclei following muon capture.

The excitation function typically resembles a Gaussian bell curve.

Plots of the responses are given for different excitation functions and the results are interpreted physically at various locations in the structure.

The high-energy tails of the excitation functions show a substantial contribution from pre-equilibrium emission.

In two series of experiments, the team measured partial excitation functions for the reactions emitting three, four, and five neutrons.

Excitation functions are also calculated theoretically using the compound-nucleus model with and without the inclusion of a pre-equilibrium emission.

The energies at which the excitation functions reached their maxima were related to the neutron-to-proton ratio of the fission products.

The excitation functions and isomer ratios are discussed with particular reference to an apparent error in the decay scheme of 44Scm.

The excitation function for the reaction emitting two neutrons was further studied in a 2006 repeat of the reaction.

They were able to identify Sg and Sg in their measurement of the 1n excitation function.

Excitation functions of gamma rays following the 168Er(7Li,.xn) reaction were used to check isotopic assignments.

Despite the apparent smooth energy dependence of the coherent and incoherent parts, interpolation does not generate the observed structure in the excitation functions.

Excitation functions, angular distributions, prompt γ–γ coincidence, electron conversion, and linear polarization measurements were obtained.

After a facility upgrade, the GSI team measured the 1n excitation function in 2003 using a metallic lead target.

The shape of the excitation functions are indicative of the dominance of optically allowed processes in the initial interaction.

Excellent agreement was found over a wide temperature range (26–3800 K) between rate constants deduced from the translational excitation function and recent thermal kinetic data.