This explains a lot about how these companies behave.

Yet there is no reason for anybody to believe that the company has behaved dishonourably.

American companies could still behave badly if they chose to do so.

This standard makes no sense because related companies do not behave as if they were unrelated.

Is that a fair description of how your company behaved towards the police?

The company behaved as if they had decided that it would be prudent not to notice him.

The company "behaves more like a utility now," she said.

More important, the professional investigators have not found that the company or its employees behaved in an illegal manner.

I wonder whether stakeholders expect companies to behave ethically, but on the whole don't actually want to see how they do it.

I think the Commission is right to criticise how companies are behaving at present.