Many decisions of arbitral tribunals are made without any hearing at all.

The parties to a dispute are usually free to agree the number and composition of the arbitral tribunal.

The case went to an arbitral tribunal, which ruled in favour of the Brewers.

Arbitral tribunals, by contrast, are constituted anew for each case.

Both courts and arbitral tribunals can make binding decisions.

Briefly, this enables the arbitral tribunal to determine for itself whether:

The arbitrators which determine the outcome of the dispute are called the arbitral tribunal.

It is a permanent framework available to assist temporary arbitral tribunals or commissions.

The Commission's involvement only occurs when an arbitral tribunal makes technical and major substantive errors.

Usually this gives investors the right to submit a case to an international arbitral tribunal when a dispute with the host country arises.

Special agreements to establish arbitral tribunals were on many occasions concluded under pressure, by political, economic or military threats.

Like the courts, arbitral tribunals generally have the same power to award costs in relation to the determination of the dispute.

A partnership or company can be an expert, whereas an arbitral tribunal always consists of readily identifiable individuals.

Arbitral tribunals are usually constituted (appointed) in two types of proceedings:

"It has been decided that an ad-hoc arbitral tribunal will be used to resolve the outstanding disputes.

An arbitral tribunal is often composed of three or sometimes of five individuals, but all those individuals take a full part in the proceedings.

He was also President of the "Raimbow Warrior" case arbitral tribunal.

International judicial institutions can be divided into courts, arbitral tribunals and quasi-judicial institutions.

The Authority represents the interests of the state in a variety of areas before national and international courts and arbitral tribunals.

In June 1892, an arbitral tribunal decided in favor of Beldiman, ordering Basilescu to close down his paper.

When needed to give an arbitral tribunal, that has advisory function, and serves as mediate in case of points of issue between members and third parties.

In most legal systems, the arbitral tribunal is able to rule upon its own jurisdiction (often referred to as the doctrine of "Kompetenz-Kompetenz" in international law).

In ad hoc arbitrations, the arbitral tribunals are appointed by the parties or by an appointing authority chosen by the parties.

When an arbitral tribunal subsequently awarded preferential treatment to the blockading powers against the claims of other nations, the US feared this would encourage future European intervention.

It also may act as an arbitral tribunal on any matter arising from a contract to which COMESA or any of its institutions is a party.