It made me remember the Turing test and think about that.

As of 2009, no one has made a computer that can pass the Turing test.

They can be programmed even to meet the Turing test.

Think for one minute if dogs developed a Turing test.

There is, of course, no official Turing test for humans.

No machine can now pass the Turing test, and none is likely to do so soon.

"So its success would be measured through a kind of Turing test," he said.

Depending on how good your rules are, you can pass a Turing test.

That is a lot to risk on the veracity of the Turing test!

Efforts in this field lead toward machines able to pass the Turing test.

Any of these roles may be changed to form a "reverse Turing test".

I think the Turing test is a lousy way to determine intelligence.

Were we perhaps the subjects of a Turing test of some kind?

I don't think we'll ever be able to write a program that could pass the Turing test."

I don't know; maybe someday there'll be programs that can pass the Turing test.

He proposed the Turing test, to say when a machine could be called "intelligent".

No machine has yet come close to passing the Turing test, and certainly not at the time of the book's publication.

This is coming very close to the 30% traditionally required to consider that a program has actually passed the Turing test.

The power and appeal of the Turing test derives from its simplicity.

The Turing test, even if imperfect, at least provides something that can actually be measured.

The first Turing test had, rather oddly, been proposed before there were any computers to speak of at all.

The Turing test is adequate for establishing the existence of mental states.

However, the Turing test is seriously flawed as a criterion of mentality.

The Turing test became the standard definition of artificial intelligence."

The most well-known method for testing machine intelligence is the Turing test.