By contrast, the House and Senate Republican bills would establish a two-step test.

He thus drew up the following two-step test:

CCH articulated a two-step test for fair dealing.

The PTO uses a two-step test to determine whether a mark is disparaging to a group of people:

A two-part analysis was born from the Chevron decision (called the "Chevron two-step test"), where a reviewing court determines:

Master's Two-Step test was sometimes used, but it was too strenuous for many patients, and inadequate for the assessment of respiratory and circulatory function during varying amounts of exercise.

In deciding whether ivi qualified as a cable system under the Copyright Act, the court applied the two-step test from Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc..