Temporal logic always has the ability to reason about a time line.

According to his wife, he first considered formalizing temporal logic in 1953.

Various types of temporal logic can be used to help reason about concurrent systems.

Such a statement can conveniently be expressed in a temporal logic.

Hamblin contributed to the development of modern temporal logic in two ways.

An early formal system of temporal logic was studied by Avicenna.

What follows is a representation of this property using parametric past time linear temporal logic.

This process is similar to how a temporal logic represents the passage of time using only declarative propositions.

Temporal logics are traditionally interpreted in terms of Kripke structures.

Temporal logic has found an important application in formal verification, where it is used to state requirements of hardware or software systems.

In a temporal logic, statements can have a truth value which can vary in time.

Interval temporal logics find application in computer science, artificial intelligence and linguistics.

These properties can be expressed, for example, using Linear Temporal Logic.

His works in computer science focused on temporal logic and model checking, particularly regarding fairness properties of concurrent systems.

For instance, in order to preserve properties of linear temporal logic, the following two conditions are needed:

The core of the Logical Framework is the "temporal logic model" that runs through the matrix.

Time travel had always fascinated Uhura, but it was easy to get lost in the twists and double-backs of temporal logic.

Logical properties express the intended functioning of the system in the form of temporal logic formulas.

To alleviate this problem, linear temporal logic is usually used in conjunction with the tableau method to prove that such states cannot be reached.

This treatment of truth values over time differentiates temporal logic from computational verb logic.

For example, N operator cannot be expressed in Temporal Logic of Actions.

Even experts often stare for minutes at relatively small temporal logic formulae (particularly when they have nested "until" operators).

Bostrom's trilemma is formulated in temporal logic as follows:

Other logics of interest include temporal logic, modal logic and fuzzy logic.

Instead a temporal logic formula can talk about two unrelated parts of a system, which because they are unrelated tacitly evolve in parallel.