It also remanded a case regarding a Chicago handgun prohibition.

Likewise, an appeals court may remand a case to a trial court.

Judges will often remand a case for further prosecutory investigation rather than render an innocent verdict.

Finally, it may remand a case upon concluding that the lower court not only made a mistake but also did not adjudicate issues that must be considered.

In the landmark 1976 California case of Landeros v. Flood, the California Supreme Court remanded a case to the trial court for action in tort against a treating physician for failure to report suspected child abuse.

A federal district court's order remanding a case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims is not a remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction for which appellate review is barred by 28 U. S. C. 1447(c) and (d).

In other words, the amount in controversy must be equal to or more than $75,000.01, and (in a case which has been removed from a state court to the federal court) a federal court must remand a case back to state court if the amount in controversy is exactly $75,000.00.