Dodatkowe przykłady dopasowywane są do haseł w zautomatyzowany sposób - nie gwarantujemy ich poprawności.
If proof of damages is required, the court may schedule another hearing on that issue.
In each case, she dropped depth charges, but could produce no solid proof of damage to the enemy.
Libel laws of that period required virtually no proof of damage to the plaintiff.
Registration doesn't require proof of damage.
Proof of damage unnecessary.
The U.S. would find it harder to dig in its heels waiting for full scientific proof of damage before endorsing emission levels for pollutants.
Violation of the law is a criminal offense, and an offender can be ordered to pay compensation to victims of discrimination, even without proof of damages.
But Tom Greene, a lawyer for the states, said he expected Microsoft to press the point that without more proof of damage there is no justification for a broad remedy.
"The trial court erred in holding that a claim for fee forfeiture requires proof of damage," wrote a three-judge panel from the Texas Court of Appeals, in Houston.
However, it is important that such precautions or countermeasures are based on a scientific risk assessment, yet there is currently no question of having sure scientific proof of damage to endocrine systems by chemicals.
I therefore am of opinion that a trading corporation may sue for a libel calculated to injure them in respect of their business, and may do so without any proof of damage general or special.
The crippled galley had fallen well astern of the rest of the convoy, crawling on a handful of crippled oars while white water jetted from her pumps in clear proof of damage below the waterline.
In spite, however, of this proof of damages, the jury found, in Carr's action against Messrs. Hood and Sharpe, the publishers of 'My Pocket Book', that the criticism was fair and justifiable (1808).
As to the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, Wright ruled ruled that Jones failed to show that Clinton's actions constituted "outrageous conduct" as required of the tort alongside not showing proof of damages caused by distress.
The inherent tendency test has been held to be justified by the small geographical size of Singapore, the fact that there is no jury system and that judges have to decide both questions of law and fact, and that the test renders proof of damage to the administration of justice unnecessary.