paraconsistent logic

Perhaps the most prominent advocate of paraconsistent logic in the world today.

It is presented here merely as an illustration of how a paraconsistent logic can work.

Paraconsistent logic makes it possible to distinguish between inconsistent theories and to reason with them.

One of the first to develop formal systems of paraconsistent logic.

Logicians concerned with this have tried to develop paraconsistent logics.

Paraconsistent logic has been proposed as a means of dealing with ethical and other normative conflicts.

Notable figures in the history and/or modern development of paraconsistent logic include:

One can include the communities of informal logic and paraconsistent logic.

This expressive limitation can be overcome in paraconsistent logic.

A paraconsistent logic is a logical system that attempts to deal with contradictions in a discriminating way.

In some sense, then, paraconsistent logic is more conservative or cautious than classical logic.

One important type of paraconsistent logic is relevance logic.

Some computer scientists have utilized paraconsistent logic as a means of coping gracefully with inconsistent information.

Paraconsistent logics have been developed that allow for sub-contrary forming operators.

Has written extensively on the general structural features and philosophical foundations of paraconsistent logics.

In general, the classical deduction theorem doesn't hold in paraconsistent logic.

Thus paraconsistent logics can still be vulnerable to this, even if they are immune to the liar paradox.

However, the study of paraconsistent logics, does not necessarily entail a dialetheist viewpoint.

The paradox may be solved, but at the expense of making the logic a paraconsistent logic.

Berto (2009) explores the relationship between Wittgenstein's writing and theories of paraconsistent logic.

Thus it seems natural to regard paraconsistent logic as the "dual" of intuitionistic logic.

Paraconsistent logic has been applied as a means of managing inconsistency in numerous domains, including:

Paraconsistent logic has been proposed as a means for dealing with the pervasive inconsistencies among the documentation, use cases, and code of large software systems.

Another articulate critic of paraconsistent logic.

The pioneer ideas of Vasiliev were rediscovered in the early 1960s, and formed a basis mainly for paraconsistent logic.