A. I think now the main question is the legal framework.

That is why I say yes, we work within a legal framework.

The most important issue, to my mind, is that of the legal framework.

Its legal framework is the same as in most European states.

We want to put in place a European legal framework.

We do not have a legal framework for the use of these products.

We therefore now have a legal framework and it must, of course, be put to use.

The new agreement should also provide the legal framework to build on these for the future.

"But what today's agreement does is give families a legal framework in the future if the efforts that are under way don't work."

I do not think we need a uniform legal framework.

I have voted against, because no new legal framework is required.

Any other organization or initiative is working outside the legal framework.

It will probably be replaced by a new legal framework.

As yet there is no common legal framework, but only a decision to promote one.

It sets up legal framework for the work of the other two arms.

If we create a legal framework for the future now, it could be very useful to our thinking on the environment.

For that to happen, we need a suitable legal framework.

I expect to be an institutional president who will not go outside of the legal framework.

I also will reject a legal framework that does not work.

But this must be accompanied by the legal framework the world needs.

In the final analysis, every new legal framework has a huge impact on the people affected.

It is high time we had a clear legal framework for starting up these agencies.

But, unfortunately, the legal framework does not allow us to go that far.

It will give us a uniform European legal framework, probably from 2005.

I believe that any movement in this field should be within the existing legal framework.