Well the area of search is defined on the key diagram.

There are certain things marked on that key diagram to give you clues.

But you have defined the route in a particular way on the key diagram, when there was an alternative way of defining it.

Can you refer me to the part of the key diagram which shows the scheme for York to which you referred a moment ago?

Should be location specific rather than site specific and so may be illustrated by a key diagram or on Ordnance Survey-based proposal maps.

In England and Wales, counties were to prepare structure plans to establish general social and economic development plans with 'key diagrams' and 'written statements'.

Er and it was felt appropriate at the time that that should be indicated on the T the key diagram to be to be helpful more than nothing else.

Er what we as I was putting was suggesting was in terms of the key diagram and the structure plan we would show it as a single arrow.

I was just gonna point out that if you were to refer to the approved key diagram, you can get a quite easily visual representation of what that embraces.

Taken in conjunction the written statement and the key diagram indicate an intention to construct an A fifty nine relief road, passing to the north of Harrogate and Knaresborough.

TEPCO's disaster-response manuals were out of date, missed key diagrams, while TEPCO was too slow to relay information to the government.

According they request the panel to recommend that policy T seven and the key diagram be amended to exclude the provision of an A sixty one relief road to the west of Harrogate.

Er you would indicate somewhere in the Harrogate Knaresborough are on the key diagram, a solid black triangle to illustrate an A fifty nine Harrogate Knaresborough relief road?

They consisted of a broad framework of policies looking forward up to 20 years ahead, supported by a "key diagram" showing land use, transport and environmental proposals diagrammatically (that is, not on a locationally specific map base).

If one built a road a lot further out which is the case with the road shown in the structure plan key diagram, use of that road would represent a major diversion for local traffic, which would therefore be much less likely to use it.

Either we pursue the need for the blue route as opposed to any other route to the north of Harrogate, or the County Council puts on record, I E in a letter to the panel, that it proposes to amend the key diagram.

We would expect them to be proceeding on the basis of a specific sector, a general location in sufficient detail to enable them to place a symbol on the key diagram in the approximate location where they think a new settlement should go.

If it proposes to amend the key diagram such that it does not indicate that the County Council intends to construct a blue route, which is what the key diagram indicates to me at the moment, then the ball game becomes very different.

It seems to me that the indication you have given on the key diagram to alteration number three for Harrogate Knaresborough is exactly the same as for example the indication given for York and for Harrogate Knaresborough southern on the approved key diagram.