There are also imperative-type (jussive) uses such as Long live the King!

Infinitive and jussive forms are also found.

The word lernu is Esperanto for "learn", in the jussive mood.

The use of plural imperative and jussive verb-forms suggest that on occasion a congregation is being addressed.

The only possible alternation in the same context is between indicative and jussive following the negative particle lā.

The gerundive is sometimes considered the future passive participle, although it more closely resembles the jussive mood than the future tense.

Finally, a very small number of fixed expressions include verbs in the jussive mood, which is essentially an extension of the imperative into the third person.

The jussive mood, called the volitive in Esperanto, is used for wishing and requesting, and serves as the imperative.

The usage of the indicative, subjunctive, and jussive moods in Classical Arabic is almost completely controlled by syntactic context.

The conclusion is not an abstraction, as in the case of a theoretical syllogism, but consists in an action and is jussive, e.g.

The jussive mood expresses pleading, insistence, imploring, self-encouragement, wishing, desiring, intention, commanding, purpose, or consequence.

The column labeled "jussive ending" contains the various jussive sentences endings in the plain style.

The putative jussive mood (a reported order) is formed introducing a quotative subordinate clause with the conjunction lai.

New suffixes added to distinguish different grammatical moods (e.g. indicative mood vs. subjunctive vs. jussive).

Verbs are not inflected for person or number, but they are inflected for tense (past, present, future) and mood (indicative, infinitive, conditional, jussive).

Loss of original mood distinctions other than the indicative and imperative (i.e. subjunctive, jussive, energetic I, energetic II).

The past stem is inflected by removing the infinitive marker (ē), however the present stem and jussive mood are not so simple in many cases and are irregular.

There is a third conjugation based on the present which has three functions: it is used in place of the present in subordinate clauses, for the jussive ('let me/us/him, etc.

In the Latin language, the present subjunctive can convey jussive meaning in the third person (jussive subjunctive or coniunctivus iussivus):

It is similar to the jussive mood, with the notable exception that the cohortative appears only in first grammatical person, whereas the jussive appears in second or third.

(Note that there are also negative forms, e.g. ta-tu-boni, "we do not see", that there is also a subjunctive mood, a conditional mood, a jussive mood and the imperative.

By way of correction I can offer only the thought that the word comprimat in the third line of Musae Jovis is a jussive subjunctive ('let.crush'), not an indicative ('crushes').

Note: the negative jussive forms may also be (in Eastern Armenian) ch'piti sirem, ch'piti sires, etc; ch'piti sirei, ch'piti sireir, etc.

Final vowels disappeared from Hebrew in prehistoric times, so the distinction between the Proto-Semitic indicative, subjunctive and jussive (which were probably fairly similar to those in Arabic) is nearly blurred even in Biblical Hebrew.

The main use of the English present subjunctive, called the mandative or jussive subjunctive, occurs in that clauses (declarative content clauses; the word that can sometimes be omitted) expressing a circumstance which is desired, demanded, recommended, necessary, or similar.