The committee has also taken a strong view on export refunds.

I do not believe that export refunds are the answer to this crisis.

Goods which will be subject to an export refund claim.

Is it not time to be bold with the export refunds?

You are increasing export refunds, at any rate for cattle.

Export refunds may not be the answer because markets are closing down to us.

I would just like to respond to the idea of introducing export refunds.

The European Union must put a stop to its export refunds programme.

The Commission responded with export refunds as an emergency measure.

We should not go alone on this, and export refunds are not the problem.

There are, however, a few problems remaining, one of which I have already mentioned, namely export refunds.

There are many experts on export refunds on the committee.

No, it wants to continue paying out export refunds.

The export refund on live animals fits in with Union policy incredibly badly.

That tendency can be seen in product sale subsidies and export refunds.

Under the licensing system, you can ask for the rates of standard levy or export refund to be set in advance.

If you claim an export refund, you must raise a control copy T5.

As far as export refunds are concerned, just 13% of the money has been recovered.

To mention the example of export refunds once more, this is another area where a great deal more could be done.

As others too have mentioned, I think that export refunds for livestock should be abolished.

Since the beginning of the crisis last autumn, the Commission has made use of export refunds in order to support the market.

Export refunds for the dairy sector were further alleviated recently.

Certain destinations may attract higher rates of export refund.

Export refund is payable on the basic products used in preparing the meals.

So I would like to ask once more - is the abolition of these export refunds really unavoidable?