Some of you said the problems are in the euro area.

Behind them, however, the entire euro area is at risk.

They say that it is better to be outside the euro area.

I am sorry to say they are not only in the euro area.

We have to change the construction of the euro area.

Joining the euro area is not just an economic step, but also a political one.

Countries that are not playing by the rules of the euro area must leave the game.

"We will not let the euro area face any kind of catastrophe."

Unfortunately, in recent months, the euro area has been hit by all three.

When you're a member of the euro area you have to respect the rules.

Other countries outside the euro area are also facing very difficult times.

The euro area as a whole is no longer in recession.

Countries failing to do those things must leave the euro area.

And what is more, because they belong to the euro area.

By contrast, it is difficult as yet to find clear evidence of a new economy in the euro area.

Things are not looking good for the euro area, let us make no bones about it.

Both are needed when you belong to a family such as a euro area.

In the long term, our goal is a single seat, at least for the euro area.

As for the general issue you raised, the situation of the euro area was also discussed.

The average inflation rate of the 11 countries within the euro area is below 1%.

When it also joined the Euro area three years later interest rates went down.

I represent the last country to join the euro area.

For the euro area in particular this failure is a serious own goal.

It seems there are no limits for the leaders of the euro area.

Is it because the euro area and the common currency have problems?