That particular editorial process would seem an almost perfect example of the Matthew effect.

This is a special case of the Matthew effect.

As credit is valued in science, specific claims of the Matthew effect are contentious.

This point may be moot, however, since the scientific insight behind the Matthew effect is in any case entirely different.

This is also sometimes called the Matthew effect, "the rich get richer", and in chemistry autocatalysis.

Preferential attachment is sometimes referred to as the Matthew effect, but the two are not precisely equivalent.

His classic article on the Matthew effect in education has been cited over 1000 times in the scientific literature.

The classic example of the Matthew effect is a scientific discovery made simultaneously by two different people, one well known and the other little known.

The Matthew effect is the phenomenon that "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer".

He called this phenomenon the Matthew effect; see also Stigler's law of eponymy.

A particular case of misattribution is the Matthew effect: a quotation is often attributed to someone more famous than the real author.

This cycle leads to the "rich get richer, poor get poorer" phenomena known as the Matthew Effect.

Thus the real-world phenomenon the Matthew effect is intended to describe is quite distinct from (though certainly related to) preferential attachment.

Matthew effect (education)

I love the idea of the "Matthew Effect" and the key IS parental intervention; everything else is too intimidating.

They are also referred to under the names "Yule process", "cumulative advantage", "the rich get richer", and, less correctly, the "Matthew effect".

The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect.

It's an example of the "Matthew Effect" (perhaps Malcolm Gladwell coined that phrase?)

The h-index does not account for confounding factors such as "gratuitous authorship", the so-called Matthew effect, and the favorable citation bias associated with review articles.

A model for career progress quantitatively incorporates the Matthew Effect in order to predict the distribution of individual career length in competitive professions.

Murray offers two fairly convincing refutations of the Matthew effect, both borrowed from another theoretician of creativity, Dean Simonton.

The "Matilda effect" is a corollary to the "Matthew effect", which was postulated by the sociologist Robert K. Merton.

The Matthew effect in education was described by Keith Stanovich based on the Matthew effect in sociology.

The Matilda effect is related to the Matthew effect, which states that eminent scientists will often get more credit than a comparatively unknown researcher, even if their work is similar.

Rigney, Daniel, The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage, Columbia University Press, 2010.