In the 1990s further population growth led to more political changes on a local level.

Over next few years, many political, economic and social changes took place.

We all can feel the first real results of political change.

But the question, as always, is how to move from economic to political change.

They say the Government should first begin social, political and military changes.

The report says nothing about the political changes of the last year.

The 1920s, however, was also a period of political change.

At this time, in both countries, political changes were taking place.

Political and social changes in the country were very important for this process.

It has developed through many environmental, political, and cultural changes.

The Administration's decision last month to embrace those groups represented a significant policy shift.

In fact, I have spoken on a number of issues that were major policy shifts.

But biotechnology companies are not the only ones to benefit from the policy shift.

By the late 1930s, however, there was a notable policy shift.

Within a better designed system, the options for future policy shifts will be greater.

Suddenly, according to some officials, unexpected benefits were seen in the state's policy shift.

Japan has agreed to assume a large role in the policy shift.

President Bush, though, has not seemed open to dramatic policy shifts.

So the sister banks tried to catch up after China's dramatic policy shift of 1979.

Economic woes are not the only reason for the policy shift.