There was now no doubt about its hostile intent!

The first hint of hostile intent, and you're weapons free.

Whatever the strange craft might be, their hostile intent was obvious.

Why did he assume it had some hostile intent?

The sub at once seemed to betray a hostile intent.

You have to look for the person with hostile intent.

Now there's no longer doubt of their hostile intent.

"As a first step," it said, "the two sides stated that neither government would have hostile intent toward the other."

If you come any closer, we will assume hostile intent and fire.

So, the hostile intent seems to be fairly clear.

There was now clearly no doubt of the ships' hostile intentions.

"And who told you, madame, that I have any hostile intentions against your son?"

"We cannot allow you to approach Alaj with hostile intentions."

We have no hostile intentions toward any of you.

Every indication was that it greeted them with hostile intentions.

It gives too much access to anyone who has hostile intentions towards us.

"It would be fair to assume that they have no hostile intentions."

That took care of any doubts I might have had about the other party's hostile intentions.

What further proof, they ask, is needed to demonstrate the hostile intentions of the Federation?

You automatically assume there is some sort of hostile intention.