There are also some species not yet specified to a subgenus.

In fact, many modern authors prefer to consider it a subgenus instead.

The biggest species of the genus are found in this subgenus.

This suggestion was not accepted but the proposed name is now used as the subgenus.

Each subgenus has been further divided into a number of species complexes.

Brown made no attempt to classify the species below the subgenus level.

The species are organized by subgenus, section, subsection and series.

Unlike the majority of mosquitoes, species in this subgenus are active during the day.

It is a rather large member of its subgenus, reaching 50 mm in standard length.

It is unique in the subgenus because of its large leaves that are typically flat against the soil.

They are generally considered to be a subgenus though some authorities consider them to form a genus in their own right.

The full taxonomic name of a species includes the subgenus but this is often omitted.

Hybrids are common, but hybridization has only been recorded between members of the same subgenus.

Species from this subgenus have a heavier body as opposed to other darters.

It is the type species of the subgenus.

Species infecting lemurs have since been included in this subgenus.

It is considered by some to be a subgenus of Scaphites.

This subgenus was raised to genus status by Landau et al. in 1984.

This subgenus was created on the basis of morphology.

Species in this subgenus infect mammals other than the higher primates.

Species in this subgenus have small to medium-sized and fragile fruit bodies.

The species in this subgenus are forest mosquitoes and to date have been poorly studied.

The classification within the subgenus is thus maintained via the hierarchical parent association.

Yet another study adds Emplectocladus as a subgenus to the former.

The diagnostic criteria and characteristic features of each subgenus are discussed on the own page.