Do you think the use of soft power is good?

In the end, that is what soft power alone gets you.

So we have a great influence on people through soft power.

But many see evidence of Russian soft power at work.

Almost every leader needs a certain degree of soft power.

This is an important source of soft power for America.

America does not spend a big share of its budget on soft power.

But there are at least three things wrong with "soft power".

Of course, soft power is not the solution to all problems.

The "soft power" of Europe’s political and social model is well known.

There must be major change in America before we are a "soft power" example for anyone.

At the same time, America is expanding its soft power.

But help for Ukraine can come in the form of soft power.

He said "soft power" would be the focus of the Obama administration.

Here Europe’s economic might and soft power have a lot to contribute.

But is soft power enough for one of the world’s major emerging countries?

This has probably been the most successful use of America's "soft power" in our history.

The use of sport and physical education as soft power, or a war without weapons, is not new.

Soft power becomes a more important part of the mix.

But much of the document is also concerned with soft power.

But for the time being soft power appears to be winning.

By its nature, soft power is giving and flexible, but strong.

So there are things you can do to regain soft power.

And if so, how long will it take to recover American soft power?

In part this may be because of a desire to increase Chinese soft power.