Common sense would say yes but this comes down to corporate law.

By 2007, he had published several works in the field of international corporate law.

His cases have involved a wide range of areas, including labor, corporate and education law.

You didn't need to be if your practice was corporate law and political campaigning.

He practiced corporate law in Chicago from 1961 through 1967.

Most of his work was in corporate and antitrust law.

To be honest, the money is the major advantage of working in corporate law.

His areas of practice included public finance, corporate law and government relations.

He has written a book on corporate law and many academic articles.

In addition, under British corporate law, share stakes of more than 5 percent must be reported.

I know even less company law than you do, which is saying a lot.

He has been referred to as "the father of modern company law".

One approach is to harmonize the company law of the member states.

There is no obligation under company law to say what happens to that money.

I actually gave a few lectures there myself on company law.

He has subsequently worked for companies specializing in economic and company law.

This makes it worth encouraging the further development of company law at European level.

The next item is the Commission statement on company law.

And company law is not the same in Britain for example as on the continent.

This guide tells you what you're responsible for under company law.