He has also made important contributions to the literature on phylogenetic nomenclature.

For these and other reasons, phylogenetic nomenclature has been developed; it is still controversial.

The requirement for a rank is a major difference between traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature.

The first use of phylogenetic nomenclature in a publication can be dated to 1986.

Reclassifying reptiles has been among the key aims of phylogenetic nomenclature.

Ranks are, however, not altogether forbidden in phylogenetic nomenclature.

Under phylogenetic nomenclature, such an arrangement is unacceptable, though it offers excellent overview.

Phylogenetic nomenclature is classification using cladistics to show evolutionary relationships.

In fact, most researchers have by now employed the unranked taxa of phylogenetic nomenclature.

In phylogenetic nomenclature evolutionary grades (or any other form of paraphyly) are not accepted.

In phylogenetic nomenclature, in contrast, the newer group is always included in the old.

In phylogenetic nomenclature, the terms are used somewhat differently, as the daughter clades are included.

Such paraphyletic groups are rejected in phylogenetic nomenclature.

With the advent of phylogenetic nomenclature, this system of classification was heavily modified.

In phylogenetic nomenclature, the term has been interpreted as derived from plesiomorphy, meaning a primitive character.

Mammaliaformes is a term of phylogenetic nomenclature.

Phylogenetic nomenclature ties names to clades, groups consisting of an ancestor and all its descendants.

The name Mesangiospermae is a branch-modified node-based name in phylogenetic nomenclature.

Since the 1960s a trend called phylogenetic nomenclature (or cladism) has emerged, inspired by the cladistic method.

In phylogenetic nomenclature, there is an added caveat that the ancestral species and all descendants should be included in the group.

Some writers preferring phylogenetic nomenclature use Anthracosauria.

With the rise of phylogenetic nomenclature, the use of evolutionary grades as formal taxa has come under debate.

The books thus uses the classical systematic scheme, including a number of paraphyletic taxa that are not recognised under phylogenetic nomenclature.

For the advocates of phylogenetic nomenclature, a taxon is an individual, an entity that gains and loses attributes as time passes.

The advantages of phylogenetic nomenclature over Linnean nomenclature.