In truth, we need a new approach to industrial policy.

I believe that industrial policy is part of the change.

These scientists say Washington is trying to set a national industrial policy.

Today, though, it is not industrial policy that we are talking about.

I wonder if we should not be looking again at our industrial policy.

It is also the model for Europe's future industrial policy.

We also have to put in place real strategies for industrial policy.

For this reason, I wish the industrial policy project every success.

Like most of Japan's industrial policy today, it did not need to be.

However, if modern industrial policy stopped there, nothing would have happened over the last 25 years.

The report comes at an odd moment for industrial policy.

It is not the idea behind our commercial and industrial policies.

I wonder: what kind of industrial policy do we want for Europe?

Only then will there be a clear vision for both industrial policy and a social Europe.

For this we need an industrial policy to be adopted.

A sound industrial policy is needed, but not economic nationalism.

Can Europe live without deep reflection on industrial policy and services of general economic interest?

Industrial policy has been neglected and left to the market for too long.

And to think that just a few years ago the idea of a national industrial policy was controversial!

Thus, industrial policy is central to one of the most important political issues: work for everyone, full employment.

Then there is the matter of exports and industrial policy.

The research should be relevant to the current debate on industrial policy.

The second issue is that European industrial policy does not exist.

This concerns many areas, not just energy and industrial policies.

Gordon Brown used it when he talked about the need for an industrial policy.