Now, may we pass back to your friend with the fishing rights problem?

Of course, we do have fishing rights to that whole area.

In exchange, the Americans were given fishing rights off the east coast.

By 1964, the dispute over fishing rights began to receive national media attention.

His friend's tribe was having their fishing rights taken away, and Harry wanted to help.

For the early part of the 20th century, treaty fishing rights were met with little opposition.

There was increasing friction between the two groups over land and fishing rights.

They are united on the fishing rights issue but on little else.

In 1886, another dispute arose over fishing rights with the Americans.

On the site of these fishing rights stood the town's grain mill.

They were not allowed to fish, for the lake's fishing rights belonged to the nations about it.

Since the end of the Soviet era, fishing rights have also been granted to foreign interests.

The fishing rights were finally removed by Swiss authorities in 1843.

Consider, for example, an Indian tribe with exclusive fishing rights in a particular river.

Fishing rights must be allocated to the communities who depend on them.

There was no mention of hunting or fishing rights in this treaty.

This includes not just the laws of warfare but also such matters as fishing rights.

As a senator, he proposed a bill to curtail Indian fishing rights.

None of the early treaties addressed hunting and fishing rights.

We want a significant proportion of the contract price to be devoted to buying fishing rights.

There is an ongoing dispute between the two countries regarding fishing rights off the coast.

The treaty signed by the native people of the region guarantees them fishing rights in the river.

The fishing rights are private however although day or season rights may be purchased.

The development of weapons increased in this period to protect increasingly developed rice fields and fishing rights.

But where you can make profit is in offshore fishing rights, out to the edge of the Shelf.

Now, may we pass back to your friend with the fishing rights problem?

Of course, we do have fishing rights to that whole area.

In exchange, the Americans were given fishing rights off the east coast.

By 1964, the dispute over fishing rights began to receive national media attention.

His friend's tribe was having their fishing rights taken away, and Harry wanted to help.

For the early part of the 20th century, treaty fishing rights were met with little opposition.

There was increasing friction between the two groups over land and fishing rights.

They are united on the fishing rights issue but on little else.

In 1886, another dispute arose over fishing rights with the Americans.

On the site of these fishing rights stood the town's grain mill.

They were not allowed to fish, for the lake's fishing rights belonged to the nations about it.

Since the end of the Soviet era, fishing rights have also been granted to foreign interests.

The fishing rights were finally removed by Swiss authorities in 1843.

Consider, for example, an Indian tribe with exclusive fishing rights in a particular river.

Fishing rights must be allocated to the communities who depend on them.

There was no mention of hunting or fishing rights in this treaty.

This includes not just the laws of warfare but also such matters as fishing rights.

As a senator, he proposed a bill to curtail Indian fishing rights.

None of the early treaties addressed hunting and fishing rights.

He liked his shooting and fishing right from the start.'

We want a significant proportion of the contract price to be devoted to buying fishing rights.

There is an ongoing dispute between the two countries regarding fishing rights off the coast.

The treaty signed by the native people of the region guarantees them fishing rights in the river.

The fishing rights are private however although day or season rights may be purchased.

The development of weapons increased in this period to protect increasingly developed rice fields and fishing rights.