Instead the board adopted the Republican plan along party lines.

In many instances, the impact of the Republican plan is not so clear.

The third element of the Republican plan is the most original.

But that was not part of Republican plan at the time.

The government, under the Republican plan, would not even limit the amount the private market could charge.

Most reports say only that he opposed the Republican plan.

The Republican plan would require that, after two years on welfare, people take jobs or become part of some work program.

So the amount actually spent would rise under the Republican plan.

Under the Republican plan, families without children would no longer get the credit.

The Republican plan would cost $31.2 billion over five years.

Both Republican plans would eliminate the deficit in seven years, rather than 10, and envision tax cuts totaling as much as $353 billion over that span.

Pushed aside are Republican plans to try to repeal the estate tax.

He took the opportunity to argue that a Republican tax-cut plan was too costly.

The governors object to features of Democratic proposals as well as Republican plans.

Dr. G. Edward Janosik, a political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania, was opposed to the Green plan, as well as Republican plans.

He opposes in particular Republican plans to eliminate the Federal guarantee of a subsistence income for all who qualify.

Republican plans in Washington to hold down Government spending have caused an odd tension in this land of middle-class retirees.

The alternatives include two Republican plans.

During the first, disastrous months of his campaign, he criticized Republican plans for Medicare reform as "right-wing social engineering," then, two days later, reversed himself.

Republican plans still call for about $100 billion more of those cuts than the President will accept, he said.