Is it anything more than microevolution left running for a thousand or a million generations?

Any observed evolutionary change is described by them as being "just microevolution".

Such studies can also reveal a lot about the general role of microevolution in species divergence.

Instead, they say that macroevolution is nothing more than microevolution played out over long periods.

Ecological genetics concerns itself with observing microevolution in the wild.

Is there more to macroevolution and the long-term transformation of life than microevolution running for a million generations?

Her claim that microevolution is quite different from macroevolution is a common contention.

He conducted research in radiation genetics, experimental population genetics, and microevolution.

During microevolution changes in allele frequencies definitely do occur.

Although creationists accept microevolution of varieties within a kind, they claim that macroevolution does not happen.

In general, macroevolution is regarded as the outcome of long periods of microevolution.

Microevolution over time may lead to speciation or the appearance of novel structure, sometimes classified as macroevolution.

This acceptance of "microevolution" only within a "kind" is also typical of old Earth creationism.

"But macroevolution is not just microevolution scaled up.

Most biologists do not make the distinction between microevolution and macroevolution; the larger changes are simply the accumulation of small changes.

Like other skeptics, he readily accepts what he calls "microevolution," the ability of species to adapt to changing conditions in their environment.

Goldschmidt thought that small gradual changes could not bridge the hypothetical divide between microevolution and macroevolution.

However, as biologists define macroevolution, both microevolution and macroevolution have been observed.

The core of the debate for me, therefore, is the extrapolation of microevolution to macroevolution."

In palaeontology, the ability to explain historical observations by extrapolation from microevolution to macroevolution is proposed.

So Telekenesis (sic) is really just focusing on "macroevolution" and completely ignoring "microevolution."

Contrary to claims by creationists, macro and microevolution describe fundamentally identical processes on different time scales.

Some scientists believe humans are pushing the microevolution of HIV toward more resistant viruses.

This is microevolution.

Population genetics is the branch of biology that provides the mathematical structure for the study of the process of microevolution.