Montesquieu wrote that people in old countries are formed by their institutions.

Even the friend of Montesquieu can see no significance in race or climate.

Montesquieu's early life occurred at a time of significant governmental change.

Montesquieu is, to be sure, a philosopher who talked about democracy and the nation state.

Montesquieu was especially impressed with the system of government that had developed in England by the mid-1700s.

Montesquieu withdrew from the practice of law to devote himself to study and writing.

Montesquieu's political anthropology gave rise to his theories on government.

I see this as running counter to Montesquieu's division of powers.

Montesquieu is therefore one of the first to describe the Jews as victims.

In Charles's case, Montesquieu has a lot to answer for.

If it's a good class, mention Montesquieu and the separation of powers.

And that is the most powerful counter-argument to Montesquieu et al.

Driving each classification of political system, according to Montesquieu, must be what he calls a "principle".

Now listen to the great Montesquieu on this same subject:

Much of the land once belonged to the Montesquieu Family.

It shows that we have made our contribution to history, on the pattern laid down by Montesquieu.

Montesquieu said, "England is the freest country in the world."

Montesquieu is generally regarded as an early founding figure of comparative law.

Montesquieu's ideas are important because they ended the feudalistic structure.

And, Montesquieu, thanks once again for sharing your thoughts.

Montesquieu said there can be no liberty when you combine the executive and the legislative.

Montesquieu said, "No people have true common sense but those who are born in England."

Montesquieu thought that some climates were better than others.

Montesquieu described division of political power among an executive (government), a legislature, and a judiciary.

Charles published his protest and sent it to Montesquieu.